{"id":3609,"date":"2026-10-08T20:47:29","date_gmt":"2026-10-08T12:47:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/?p=3609"},"modified":"2026-10-08T20:47:29","modified_gmt":"2026-10-08T12:47:29","slug":"what-are-the-principles-of-by-structure-in-language-teaching-4f35-1b6abe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/08\/what-are-the-principles-of-by-structure-in-language-teaching-4f35-1b6abe\/","title":{"rendered":"What are the principles of ‘By Structure’ in language teaching?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hey everyone, if you\u2019ve ever sat in a language class going through random grammar rules, memorizing vocab lists that never feel tied together, and left feeling like you\u2019ve wasted time but still can\u2019t string a coherent sentence in real life\u2014you\u2019re not alone. I\u2019ve been in this game for years, working as part of the team that develops the materials we call \u201cBy Structure\u201d for language educators, and honestly? That frustration\u2019s why our whole approach exists. Today I wanna break down what the principles of \u201cBy Structure\u201d in language teaching actually are, skip the jargon, and be real about why this isn\u2019t just another buzzword in the edtech space. By Structure<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

First off, let\u2019s get one thing straight: \u201cBy Structure\u201d isn\u2019t just teaching grammar. That\u2019s the mistake a lot of folks make when they hear \u201cstructure\u201d and tune out. Grammar is a part of it, yeah, but structure in language teaching means way more. It\u2019s about how every piece of language\u2014words, tenses, phrases, even gestures\u2014fits together like a puzzle, not like a random pile of pieces you have to guess how to assemble. And as a supplier of these resources, I\u2019ve seen firsthand how when you center teaching around structure, it fixes so many of the pain points I saw in my own early language learning days.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s start with the first core principle we live by: Structure is the foundation, not an afterthought. Wait, let me explain that. So many curricula today build lessons around topics\u2014like \u201cgrocery shopping\u201d or \u201ctalking about hobbies\u201d\u2014and then tuck in a few grammar rules to fit that topic. That\u2019s backwards. When you use By Structure, you flip that: you pick a specific, functional language structure first, then build every lesson around how to use that structure in real, relatable situations. For example, instead of a lesson about \u201casking for directions\u201d that throws in prepositions of place willy-nilly, you zero in on the structure \u201cCan you tell me how to get to [location]?\u201d or \u201cIs [street] on your left or right?\u201d Then you practice that structure with different locations, different scenarios\u2014asking a barista for a subway stop, asking a local for a park\u2014so students don\u2019t just memorize a phrase, they internalize how the structure works for any context. I remember last year a high school teacher in Texas reached out saying that after switching to our materials, her students went from mixing up \u201cI go\u201d and \u201cI went\u201d all the time to actually using past and present tense correctly in conversations\u2014because we separated the tense structure from random topics and let them master one at a time before moving on. That\u2019s the magic here.<\/p>\n

Second principle: Context drives structure, not the other way around. Oh, this is huge, and it\u2019s why a lot of generic grammar textbooks fall flat. Like, think about how we actually use language in real life. If you\u2019re running late to a friend\u2019s birthday dinner, you don\u2019t stop to list off the rules for \u201cI am going to be late\u201d before texting them\u2014you just say it, because the context of being rushed makes that structure make sense. When we develop By Structure materials, we don\u2019t teach a structure in a vacuum. We set up a tiny, relatable scenario first: maybe a student forgot their textbook and needs to ask a classmate for help, or they\u2019re planning a weekend trip and need to book a hotel. Then we introduce the exact structure they need to pull that off. That way, students don\u2019t just know the structure\u2014they know when to use it. I once talked to a college ESL student from Mexico who told me he\u2019d studied English for 6 years but could never hold a conversation until he started using our beginner modules. He said before, he could recite that \u201cPresent Continuous is for actions happening now\u201d but when someone asked \u201cWhat are you doing?\u201d he\u2019d freeze, because he never learned how that structure actually fits into a casual chat. That\u2019s the gap By Structure closes: it ties structure to context so learners don\u2019t just know rules, they know usage.<\/p>\n

Third principle: Build incrementally, not all at once. Language isn\u2019t something you cram, right? And By Structure respects that. We don\u2019t throw 10 new structures at a student in one lesson, or jump from simple present tense to past perfect in a week. Instead, we layer structures like building a house. Start with the basics: structures for greetings, introducing yourself, ordering food. Once a student\u2019s solid on that, you add a new structure that builds on what they already know\u2014like moving from \u201cI want coffee\u201d to \u201cI would like a large coffee\u201d once they get the hang of requesting things. It\u2019s like when you learn to ride a bike: you start with balance (the simplest structure of moving forward), then add pedaling, then turning, then stopping\u2014you don\u2019t try to do a wheelie on day one. As a supplier, this incremental approach is why our materials work for everyone, from absolute beginners to advanced learners. A lot of our customers are small language schools that have students coming in at all levels, and they love that they can pick modules that match where each student is, instead of forcing everyone through the same pace. Last quarter, a school in Seoul told me that their dropout rate for beginner ESL went down by 30% after they switched to our incremental structure-based lessons. Said students didn\u2019t feel overwhelmed anymore because each new structure felt like a natural step, not a random curveball.<\/p>\n

Fourth principle: Structure should be communicative, not just accurate. Wait, let\u2019s clarify that. Accuracy is important, but if you only teach for perfect grammar, students get so scared of making mistakes they never actually talk. By Structure balances both. Each lesson centers on using the structure to do something real\u2014like disagreeing with a classmate, making a suggestion, or asking for clarification. We build in low-stakes practice so students can mess up without feeling embarrassed, because the goal is communication first, accuracy second. For example, a lesson on the structure \u201cI think that\u2026\u201d won\u2019t just have students filling in blanks; it\u2019ll have them discussing their favorite movies, their least favorite homework, whatever\u2019s relevant, using \u201cI think that\u2026\u201d to share their opinions. A student might say \u201cI think that pizza is best than tacos\u201d and that\u2019s okay\u2014they\u2019re communicating, they\u2019re using the structure, and later the teacher can gently correct the \u201cbest than\u201d to \u201cbetter than\u201d without killing their confidence. I\u2019ve heard so many teachers say that this is the biggest difference between our materials and traditional ones. One tutor in Canada told me she used to spend half her class time marking grammar mistakes, but now with our structure-based lessons, her students talk more in 20 minutes than they used to in a whole hour, and their accuracy actually gets better because they\u2019re using the structure in meaningful ways. That\u2019s the point of language, right? To connect, not to write a perfect essay.<\/p>\n

Fifth principle: Meet learners where they are, structurally. This is something we stress a lot as a supplier, because we know not all learners have the same needs. A business professional learning English needs different structures than a teen learning for a trip abroad, right? So By Structure isn\u2019t a one-size-fits-all set of rules. We tailor structures to the learner\u2019s goals. For a nurse learning medical English, we have modules focused on structures like \u201cCan you describe your symptoms?\u201d or \u201cTake this medication twice a day\u201d\u2014structures they\u2019ll actually use at work. For a teen planning a backpacking trip, we have structures for asking about prices, understanding train schedules, and making small talk with locals. The core is still the same: structure as the foundation, context tied to use, incremental learning, communication over perfection\u2014but we adjust the specific structures to match what the learner actually needs. I think that\u2019s why our stuff stands out from other generic language tools. We don\u2019t just make worksheets; we make resources that adapt to what the user is actually trying to do with the language.<\/p>\n

Now, let\u2019s be real for a second. No approach is perfect, and we\u2019ve definitely had our share of feedback over the years. Some people say structure-based teaching is too rigid, that it limits creativity. But here\u2019s the thing: By Structure is a framework, not a cage. Once learners master the core structures, they can mix and match them to create new phrases, new sentences, new ways to say what they want. That\u2019s way better than starting with creativity and no foundation\u2014most learners just end up saying nonsensical things because they don\u2019t have the structure to build on. I\u2019ve seen that so many times: a student who only memorizes random phrases can\u2019t adapt when a situation is a little different, but a student who masters core structures can tweak them to fit any scenario. Like, if they know the structure \u201cI would like [noun]\u201d, they can use it to order coffee, buy a shirt, ask for a book\u2014all different contexts, same structure, just swapped out the noun. That\u2019s the real power here.<\/p>\n

As someone who\u2019s been on the supplier side, I also wanna talk about why we care so much about getting these principles right. We don\u2019t just sell lesson plans or digital tools\u2014we\u2019re part of helping language educators do their jobs better, and helping learners actually feel successful when they\u2019re trying to learn a new language. I\u2019ve talked to learners who cried because they\u2019d been studying for years and still couldn\u2019t order food abroad, and that\u2019s the stuff that drives us. When a teacher tells us their student just had a 5-minute conversation with a tourist and used the structure they learned in our module, that\u2019s when we know we\u2019re doing something right.<\/p>\n

So if you\u2019re a language teacher, a tutor, or someone running a language program, and you\u2019re tired of curricula that feel outdated, overwhelming, or just not working for your students, this is what we\u2019re all about. We\u2019ve built our whole supply of By Structure resources around these five principles, and we\u2019re always updating them based on what educators and learners tell us works.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re looking to upgrade your language materials, train your staff on structure-based teaching, or just chat about how By Structure could fit your needs, we\u2019re here to connect. Whether you\u2019re a small private school, a big university, or a community center, we can work with you to find what fits. Reach out to us to start a conversation about how we can support your language teaching goals.<\/p>\n

By Structure<\/a> References
\nLightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press.
\nEllis, R. (2019). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
\nKrashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press.<\/p>\n

\n

Zhejiang Jigong Valve Co., Ltd.<\/a><\/p>\n

Address: Dongou Industrial Park, Oubei Subdistrict, Yongjia County, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province (within Zhejiang Yinhe Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd.)
E-mail: Sales@cnzjsk.com.cn
WebSite: https:\/\/www.ball-china.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hey everyone, if you\u2019ve ever sat in a language class going through random grammar rules, memorizing … What are the principles of ‘By Structure’ in language teaching?<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":265,"featured_media":3609,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3572],"class_list":["post-3609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry","tag-by-structure-4839-1ba246"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/265"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3609"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3609\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3609"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nahradni-dily.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}